3 ms·
You're trying to make a point where there isn't one because you are an ideologue. First you mentioned "morbidly obese and diabetic" and then capitulated to "low
by MarcelOlsz 3y ago
You're trying to make a point where there isn't one because you are an ideologue. First you mentioned "morbidly obese and diabetic" and then capitulated to "low but decidedly non-zero".
>increased stress levels and lower sleep quality for anyone who lives near roads?
Damn so literally everyone?
Sorry but it's clear you have never been in a car you liked.
- acdha 3y ago> You're trying to make a point where there isn't one because you are an ideologue. First you mentioned "morbidly obese and diabetic" I did? You appear to have confused me with someone else. > Sorry but it's clear you have never been in a car you liked. I have, actually, but I don’t let that blind me to the real costs. Driving is the most dangerous activity most of us regularly engage in and I think we should be mindful of the costs. For example, reducing the health impacts of high-speed busy roads on nearby residents is only fair to those people and has minimal impact on quality of life since those roads are a chore to drive on, too. We don’t need to ban someone’s fun trip to the mountains to make big quality of life improvements for millions of people.
- MarcelOlsz 3y agoAgreed. Driving a car doesn't induce anything close to obesity and diabetes. Right about it being the most dangerous activity though. I am trying to get into rally racing now.