> could be unfair or deceptive > may be unfair or deceptive > risks running afoul of the law Why the weasel words here? If it is true that "a business that

> could be unfair or deceptive > may be unfair or deceptive > risks running afoul of the law Why the weasel words here? If it is true that "a business that collects user data based on one set of privacy commitments cannot then unilaterally renege on those commitments after collecting users' data," then in what cases would that conduct not be unfair or deceptive? Why are they trying to leave room for exceptions in this language?