3 ms·
It's more lightweight than OsmAnd - install size & startup / rendering is quicker. For storage that won't matter much as the maps take up way more space than t
by RetroTechie 3y ago
It's more lightweight than OsmAnd - install size & startup / rendering is quicker.
For storage that won't matter much as the maps take up way more space than the app (eg. NL map ~1 GB).
OsmAnd has many more features & settings. Some useful, but (imho) more often getting in the way. For example I've had many times where I accidentally placed a marker on a map, and there were 1001 things to do with that marker, except... simply delete.
Or (on OsmAnd) you change a setting, to find it only applies to a specific map. Again: may have its uses, but too fiddly for my taste / usage.
Otoh: OsmAnd has eg. points of interest, which can show nearest grocery stores, gas stations & so on. Veeerry useful. Organic Maps doesn't have that (yet?) afaict.
OsmAnd appears to be updated more often. Not sure I'd call that a feature, tbh.
It would be nice if apps like these could share map data. Anyone know if that's possible / easy, and if so, how?