3 ms·

I don't know why anyone pays for 4 when 3.5 is already a billion times better than what we had 2 years ago. 3.5-turbo, at least from an API perspective is an ex

I don't know why anyone pays for 4 when 3.5 is already a billion times better than what we had 2 years ago. 3.5-turbo, at least from an API perspective is an extremely cost effective way for you to add more intelligent decision making to your applications and backend processes. We're going to use GPT 3.5-turbo to help us decide if a specific thing is probably "this" or "that" or "one of the following".... Super easy to use it that way than rolling our own crappy bag-of-words neural network that uses word2vec. Tiny bit slower, but worth it.

jasonjmcghee 3y ago
I use ChatGPT 4 daily (usually one of my custom GPTs). 3.5 is next to useless on anything I'm reaching to ChatGPT for. For pipeline / LLM project stuff- sometimes I can use 3.5, but again most interesting things I take on requires 4. 3.5 is so unreliable, is terrible at detailed / specific prompts. Fine tuning 3.5 helps massively though. Especially for things like using it as a general classifier.
fragmede 3y ago
4 is still better than 3.5. Enough to justify the (low) cost. Most recently, 3.5 couldn't identity that February 29th is a valid date this year, but gpt-4 does.
hackerlight 3y ago
3.5 wastes my time with hallucinated code. 4 wastes less time. A lot less.
- muzani 3y ago
  This is it for me. The time saved is worth far, far more than $20.
weird-eye-issue 3y ago
For some things it makes a huge difference. We use several different models in production depending on the exact use case
muzani 3y ago
Also we're not just paying for GPT4. The paid version comes with image, so you can take photos of log dumps or diagrams. It also does some image manipulation stuff for me and passes me the code. There's also DALL-E 3, but it's more of a bonus than something I'd pay for. PDF is cool too, but it's not the only service out there. I'd likely have unsubscribed if it was only 4 because the API version is better.
Gooblebrai 3y ago
The image feature is game changing compared to 3.5

jasonjmcghee 3y ago

I use ChatGPT 4 daily (usually one of my custom GPTs). 3.5 is next to useless on anything I'm reaching to ChatGPT for. For pipeline / LLM project stuff- sometimes I can use 3.5, but again most interesting things I take on requires 4. 3.5 is so unreliable, is terrible at detailed / specific prompts. Fine tuning 3.5 helps massively though. Especially for things like using it as a general classifier.

fragmede 3y ago

4 is still better than 3.5. Enough to justify the (low) cost. Most recently, 3.5 couldn't identity that February 29th is a valid date this year, but gpt-4 does.

hackerlight 3y ago

3.5 wastes my time with hallucinated code. 4 wastes less time. A lot less.

muzani 3y ago
This is it for me. The time saved is worth far, far more than $20.

weird-eye-issue 3y ago

For some things it makes a huge difference. We use several different models in production depending on the exact use case

muzani 3y ago

Also we're not just paying for GPT4. The paid version comes with image, so you can take photos of log dumps or diagrams. It also does some image manipulation stuff for me and passes me the code. There's also DALL-E 3, but it's more of a bonus than something I'd pay for. PDF is cool too, but it's not the only service out there. I'd likely have unsubscribed if it was only 4 because the API version is better.

Gooblebrai 3y ago

The image feature is game changing compared to 3.5