3 ms·

> My point wasn't even about who was correct. My point was that not everyone believed the lies. Eh: "Everyone sane knew at the time that Iraq had no WMD". Any

• lapcat 3y ago
  > > My point wasn't even about who was correct. My point was that not everyone believed the lies. > Eh: "Everyone sane knew at the time that Iraq had no WMD". You're misrepresenting the order of the conversation, and you cut off the end of the above quote that mentioned "hindsight". My citation of the protests was in response to this claim: > It's easy to say in hindsight "well of course there weren't any WMDs!" but with the knowledge of what was available to the public, it really wasn't that clear, and it very well could have been true. I understand that you don't like my initial statement "Everyone sane knew at the time that Iraq had no WMD", because of what it might imply about you personally. However, when I said "My point was", I was referring to the protests and hindsight. There's a myth that everyone at the time believed Iraq had WMD, but no, a large number of people did not believe it. You were trying to dismiss the protesters by comparing them with cranks, but they were actually the largest protests that the world had ever seen. I think it's safe to say that the US as a whole wasn't particularly sane after 9/11. We went out of our minds, invading two sovereign nations, creating a vast extra-legal apparatus of secret unaccountable courts and domestic spying that still exists today, imprisoned people for years under inhumane conditions in Gitmo without trial or any legal rights, committed torture, etc. The response was vastly disproportionate and irrational (much like the Israeli response now).