4 ms·
The explanation of grandparents for the perihelium effect of Mercury tried to explain the 'overshoot'. And yes, in a perfectly circular orbit there would be no
by plank 3y ago
The explanation of grandparents for the perihelium effect of Mercury tried to explain the 'overshoot'. And yes, in a perfectly circular orbit there would be no overshoot??
I do not think grandparent tried to say that all relativistic effects were caused by the increase of the 'relativistic' mass, just that the overshoot was.
So I am sorry: I cannot see how this argument disproves the explanation of grandparent. And just to be clear: I do not think in the way of grandparents argument myself.
Kind regards,
Roel
- sigmoid10 3y ago>And yes, in a perfectly circular orbit there would be no overshoot?? That's where you and the other comment are wrong. The only way to get a stable circular two body orbit is for newtonian potentials which are exactly 1/r shaped. Add any other term (like 1/r^3 for General Relativity) and you essentially get more or less chaotic movement over time, similar to the three body problem in newtonian gravity. See Betrand's theorem [1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand%27s_theorem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand%27s_theorem