I can visualize a little cartoon Einstein scribbling away on his chalkboard, but everything I'd actually project on the chalkboard would be nonsense. Relying o

I can visualize a little cartoon Einstein scribbling away on his chalkboard, but everything I'd actually project on the chalkboard would be nonsense. Relying on my cartoon output or thinking it has value would be madness. Someone who's studied the subject quite a bit might visualize an actual Einstein chalkboard from memory. Their output could be verified and referenced, but looking for new Einstein-level math on the chalkboard would be madness. Someone who Einstein himself would consider a peer might use this visualization method as a way to do actual work. If we're assigning value to our chalkboards we'd be able to explain why we chose the numbers -1, 0, and 1. This would bias any math we'd do towards one of the chalkboards depending on our intent. At this point my chalkboard is useful as a filter. Putting this all together, we'd see that the overall look of the cartoon responses would be a blend of 0 and 1 styles and would depend on our requests e.g. a reference request would look mostly like 0's art style. My own personal art style will be intentionally absent because it's only ever framing nonsense, by my own admission.