3 ms·
You didn't read that right; at no point did I take the outcome seriously. But the real point isn't Bruen's specific test: it's the precedent established that a
by klyrs 3y ago
You didn't read that right; at no point did I take the outcome seriously.
But the real point isn't Bruen's specific test: it's the precedent established that activist judges can rewind legal interpretation by centuries which is concerning. Our legislative history contains some real doozies that we don't want coming back.
- Acrobatic_Road 3y agoThey didn't rewind legal interpretations. If you're referring to the individual rights vs "collective" rights debate from Heller (which Bruen reaffirmed), the historical record is strongly in favor of individual rights.