these services are a form of collusion that basically bypass normal supply and demand and are effectively anti-free market. i can see it being ok if all the pro

these services are a form of collusion that basically bypass normal supply and demand and are effectively anti-free market. i can see it being ok if all the properties were owned by one person (which they aren't) but then the gov't would be within its rights to go break it up as an unfair monopoly. which i might add, is a monopoly on a basic human need for shelter. a right even? this is corrupt greed at its worst, market manipulation at best.