4 ms·
Both approaches have value. I value Facebook's closed nature, as it gives me a place to communicate with close friends and family. I live across the country f
by machrider 14y ago
Both approaches have value. I value Facebook's closed nature, as it gives me a place to communicate with close friends and family. I live across the country from most of my family, but I see their photos and keep up with them all the time, it's great.
Also, on G+, I have to put people in a circle if I want to broadcast to them (and not to the entire world), right? So I'm still following people I might not want to be following using the asymmetric approach.
The stuff I post on my blog is a totally different kind of communication, and I'm happy to do it outside the context of social networking.
- lomegor 14y agoJust as a FYI, you can share to people outside of your circles, if they have it enabled. Instead of selecting a circle to share, just put their names in. Of course, this depends on the settings of the other person and doesn't disprove anything. Just wanted to tell you in case it's of any use for you.