> it is an intentional act to directly affect the people of a nation I would define terrorism as something closer to “violence with the intent to intimidate po

> it is an intentional act to directly affect the people of a nation I would define terrorism as something closer to “violence with the intent to intimidate political opponents”. This isn’t really violent, and even if it is (it’s certainly very dangerous!), there’s no political message. Unless this is a 4D chess play that somehow is supposed to weaken America by making us more stressed or something, this just seems like Russian privateering. Your definition is a bit too broad, as I think you would admit to - I’m guessing you didn’t intend it as a flawless philosophical definition, just a quick one