4 ms·
> Or, they can go after the same original sources you have cited and write their own summarizing article (but not copy the blog post, and they also can't add an
by classichasclass 3y ago
> Or, they can go after the same original sources you have cited and write their own summarizing article (but not copy the blog post, and they also can't add any of their own conclusions).
That's my point: you've done the legwork, but you don't get credit for it, and as far as Wikipedia's policies are concerned, can't. They aren't supposed to cite your blog as a source, because it's self-published. I've seen many edits citing what I thought were well-researched entries get reverted because "it's a blog."
- zozbot234 3y agoThe Wikijournal effort https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group is supposed to plug that gap. If you think you have worthwhile primary research that is up to academic standards, it can be published in WikiJournal after review, and that information can then be referenced in a Wikipedia article.