3 ms·
>Even assuming that, what does it matter? He’s not around and times change. Because they can also change for the worst. This product is less Apple iPad and mor
by FirmwareBurner 3y ago
>Even assuming that, what does it matter? He’s not around and times change.
Because they can also change for the worst. This product is less Apple iPad and more Apple Newton. Both were great innovative technical achievements of tablet computers in their eras, but only one was a smash hit with the mainstream public.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Newton https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Newton
- andsoitis 3y agoThe following products were all created under Jobs' direction and failed commercially: - Apple III (1981) - Lisa (1983) - Puck Mouse (1998) - The Cube (2000) - iTunes phone (2005) - Apple TV (2007)
- dann0 3y agoI’d argue that the Motorola iTunes phone was a success. I don’t think its goal was to be a great phone, I think it was to bring in some much needed cash. The original Apple TV, like the iPod hifi, always felt like a hobby project that really needed some decent investment. I think they couldn’t really figure out what they needed it to be, but someone important wanted to have an Apple something in their home.
- kn0where 3y agoMuch needed cash? Apple was making lots of money off the iPod in 2005. If it was a “success” it was in the sense that it proved they needed to make their own phone
- dann0 3y agoThat’s fair, but they weren’t out of the woods yet. But probably less important than I previously stated/thought.