4 ms·

When does Apple even make this claim that this should be is better / worse at the task? I get the idea of testing this for the purpose of testing this outcome b

When does Apple even make this claim that this should be is better / worse at the task? I get the idea of testing this for the purpose of testing this outcome but when I’m using safari or a movie this doesn’t come up as much but if you use pass through it is apparent. This is an intentional engineering choice and keeps on getting reposted…

tycho-newman 3y ago
For the money they charge, it sure is an interesting choice.
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
FirmwareBurner 3y ago
>When does Apple even make this claim that this should be is better / worse at the task? But then at what kind of tasks is the AVP better at in order to justify its existence/purchase?
- Ancapistani 3y ago
  It integrates far better into the entire Apple ecosystem of products. Given the current state of the software - both visionOS itself and available apps - it’s simply not a mass-market device. I believe it will be in 1-2 iterations, but we’re not there yet. For what it’s worth, I say that as someone who loves their AVP and owns several other headsets including the Quest 3 an Pimax Crystal. I’ve had my AVP for jsut over two weeks and would comfortably estimate that I’ve spent over 100 hours with it on.
  - FirmwareBurner 3y ago
    >It integrates far better into the entire Apple ecosystem of products. That's not a task you can use it for. It's just a feature. >it’s simply not a mass-market device. I believe it will be in 1-2 iterations, but we’re not there yet. My point exaxtly. I was only talking about the present device and what it doe. Not what it can do in the future iterations.