> Using multi milion euro tracked vehicles firing expensive 35 × 228 mm ammo to shoot down drones the size of a Starbucks Venti costing less than and Apple Visi

> Using multi milion euro tracked vehicles firing expensive 35 × 228 mm ammo to shoot down drones the size of a Starbucks Venti costing less than and Apple Vision Pro is like using your AR-15 to shoot mosquitos. Yes. The Royal Navy has used £1.2M Sea Viper missiles to shoot down drones in the recent Red Sea conflict. They have also used their Phalanx guns to shoot down drones, which is much cheaper than the Sea Viper. > it's the definition of asymmetric warfare. Totally. My point though was that it is possible for modern counter measures to shoot down fast moving drones, even if John Wickes can't. IIRC Phalanx was used to shoot down incoming mortar rounds for base protection in Afghanistan.