> > As noted above, a lot of arable land is used to raise animals, > The overwhelming majority of pasture lands aren't arable. See also: Wyoming. True, but th

> > As noted above, a lot of arable land is used to raise animals, > The overwhelming majority of pasture lands aren't arable. See also: Wyoming. True, but that's not a refutation of what I said. I didn't say a lot of pasture lands are arable, I said "a lot of arable land is used to raise animals." I'd also like to reiterate my point that cattle are not the animals I'd like to see more of. > No, you're hearing me talk about $25 heads of lettuce like they're a complete non-starter. We're already subsidizing agriculture massively, and while there are many forms of government spending I oppose, a subsidy which a) allows people to afford food, b) pays workers, and c) improves our food sustainability and security, is exactly the sort of thing I want my taxes going to.