3 ms·
I find Wikipedia's frontend more enjoyable than AARoads. It's understandable as the community of editors probably wasn't as technical as some other communities,
by KTibow 3y ago
I find Wikipedia's frontend more enjoyable than AARoads. It's understandable as the community of editors probably wasn't as technical as some other communities, but it feels a bit slow, there's no search, and there are a number of broken links.
- notatoad 3y agoIt makes sense that the consumption side of the site isn’t as good, since super-niche sites like this are more for the benefit of the writers than the readers. The value and enjoyment is in collecting the information, not retrieving it. And that might sound like a criticism, but it’s really not. Niche interest sites where people spend their time collecting a huge level of detail on a topic few care about are awesome, and I love them. Just realistically, they’re not there for the readers.
- stock_toaster 3y agoAre you talking about the main site landing page? I found the link to the actual wiki[1] in the nav header. [1]: https://wiki.aaroads.com https://wiki.aaroads.com
- KTibow 3y agoAh, that's much better. It's still confusing that they're separated.