4 ms·
This isn't true for web use cases. There being able to start decoding from when the first bits arrive vs the last bits can make a difference (which JPEG-XL does
by adgjlsfhk1 3y ago
This isn't true for web use cases. There being able to start decoding from when the first bits arrive vs the last bits can make a difference (which JPEG-XL does a lot better than other image formats because it first sends all the DC coefficients which lets the website display a low resolution version of the image and then fill in the detail as the rest of the image comes through.
- mort96 3y agoThat's about progressive decoding, which isn't what this benchmark is focusing on. When benchmarking decode speed, throughput is a perfectly good metric. If the article wanted to talk about progressive decode performance, it would require a complete redesign, not just a change in metric from "throughput" to "latency".