4 ms·
You're getting butthurt about stuff that's not relevant. The point is the encryption is: 1 - trivial to layer yourself 2 - not a viable business model You just
by contrarian1234 3y ago
You're getting butthurt about stuff that's not relevant. The point is the encryption is: 1 - trivial to layer yourself 2 - not a viable business model
You just need to look at Signal. It's at the same price ($0) as its competition (not 4x). And messages you can't really encryption yourself. It's still struggling to get a market foothold.
Yeah, it'd be great to have Google/Dropbox/etc with privacy. Sure. Nothing wrong with that. But you also have to pay the bills and feed your babies. This isn't a charity. Maybe I'm missing something, but this product make no sense in the market. They can't even match the market prices. They're toast
- Philipp2398 3y ago[dead]
- jacooper 3y ago> 1 - trivial to layer yourself If you are techy, this is made to be shared with families and friends, which won't do that.
- contrarian1234 3y agoAgreed, but the market of people that are not tech, care about their photos not being mined, and are willing to pay 4x the price I think is miniscule