Are they asking for actual money, or best-case money? It seems like the former from the text in the article, but that's hard to believe. I was of the impressio

Are they asking for actual money, or best-case money? It seems like the former from the text in the article, but that's hard to believe. I was of the impression that the case was about contingency payout. If Tesla stock appreciates by 600% in the next few years, then Tesla has to pay Elon Musk a fantastic amount. 600% if kind of fantastic too. If the lawyers are asking for conditional reimbursement that can be that large in the same fantastic circumstances then I don't see what's wrong about it.