3 ms·
I am not an expert on this but I think regardless of the tools or platforms being used to organize the files, more important is likely going to be the MP3 metad
by LinuxBender 3y ago
I am not an expert on this but I think regardless of the tools or platforms being used to organize the files, more important is likely going to be the MP3 metadata added to the files with date, participants, genre, comments, etc... so that you can easily switch platforms later and don't have to rely on saving some ever-growing database. Maybe you could also get the kids to give you a comment or quote to also add to the MP3 metadata.
The only platform I have used to organize and share music is Ampache [1] but that is likely overkill for your intended purpose. I don't know what the best tools would be to add the metadata to MP3 files however.
[1] - https://github.com/ampache/ampache/wiki https://github.com/ampache/ampache/wiki
- longitudinal93 3y agoEasyTag is a great, free program for adfingvmeta tags to audio files. https://flathub.org/apps/org.gnome.EasyTAG https://flathub.org/apps/org.gnome.EasyTAG
- dangravell 3y agoI would agree with this - it's the most standardised way we have. Most of the prescribed fields are designed to work for contemporary popular music, but a subset of fields could be used (and if you look into a lot of the definitions they are more abstract than they appear at first). On top of that, standard data hoarding management applies: - Take backups. - Try to record in lossless forms if you can - better flexibility later if you don't throw data away.