4 ms·
I think you think it's confusing only because you're not used to it. The two models are mathematically equivalent. The rules are unambiguous. Values which in
by Ferret7446 3y ago
I think you think it's confusing only because you're not used to it. The two models are mathematically equivalent.
The rules are unambiguous. Values which indicate capital are positive. Values which indicate ownership are negative. An increase in capital corresponds to an increase in ownership of said capital, which add up to zero. Perfectly balanced, as bookkeeping should be.
I find CR DR to be more confusing than +/-, because the latter works out naturally with basic arithmetic, whereas the former requires this arbitrary DR CR crud, which are made up terms that literally mean nothing and you have to rote memorize how they apply to different accounts (and to add insult to injury, the terms often have the exact opposite meaning to consumers due to how banks present the terminology, which means the terms literally can mean either thing depending on the context).
- foota 3y agoI think where this would get confusing is that a positive number would have to decrease some accounts, but increase others, right?
- jeltz 3y agoIt does not because if you use + and - liabilities are negative and assets positive and if you add all balances the sum is zero. Actually the commercial accounting software I use works like that, it uses negative balances for liability accounts.
- naasking 3y agoExactly, it's completely unnecessary extra information that doesn't need to appear in the core data model that the user never directly sees. Extracting credits, debits, reversals, returns, etc. is all higher-level information.