The article content is significantly less outrageous than the title suggests. I think this is one of the most ridiculous misleading headlines I've seen in a lon

The article content is significantly less outrageous than the title suggests. I think this is one of the most ridiculous misleading headlines I've seen in a long while. What he said is that "customers aren't willing to pay for the added cost of cleaner fossil fuels". He's not wrong. And this matters because as he also correctly states that "we’ve got to find a way to get the cost down".