4 ms·
Suburbia is not cheap at all, not even in the short run. The reality is that it is very expensive and heavily, heavily subsidized. US style Suberbia is a resul
by panick21_ 3y ago
Suburbia is not cheap at all, not even in the short run.
The reality is that it is very expensive and heavily, heavily subsidized. US style Suberbia is a result of the US government massive policies in encouraging suburbia style housing and highway building during the New Deal and then in the Post-WW2 boom, plus of course the Red-Lining and destruction of city centers.
These places never ever pay for themselves. You can look at the data gathered by 'Strong Towns' and 'Urban3'.
In fact the poorer parts of the city/state and of course the town center are subsidizing the richer suberbia. Its a fucking travisty of epic proportion.
Suberbia is expensive to set up initially, needs massive infrastructure backing to be viable and is horrible energy inefficient.
- jjav 3y ago> Suburbia is not cheap at all, not even in the short run. Cheap for who, though? As an individual I can't change society but I can choose where to live. So if rent in the city is 4K for 1 bedroom and in the suburb it's 2K for 3 bedrooms, suburb is cheaper.
- panick21_ 3y agoWe are talking about the system not the cost for the individual. The whole point is that hidden subsidies (and explicit rules) distort the system.