AGI as defined narrowly by OpenAI, Microsoft et al for their contracts, not what scientists would define it as . While I don’t think we are close to AGI, we al

AGI as defined narrowly by OpenAI, Microsoft et al for their contracts, not what scientists would define it as . While I don’t think we are close to AGI, we also have to acknowledge that term is forever changing meaning and goal posts , even 10 years back a Turing test would be considered sufficient, obviously not anymore . The scientific, public understanding is changing constantly and a court would have difficulty in making a decision if there is no consensus , it only has to see if the contractual definition has been met