3 ms·
More like you're arguing that there is no baby in the bath you want to throw out. Coming back to your previous comment: > This (i.e. proving a variable is ne
by pyrale 3y ago
More like you're arguing that there is no baby in the bath you want to throw out.
Coming back to your previous comment:
> This (i.e. proving a variable is never used) is impossible in general since it is equivalent to the halting problem.
Many useful provers/programs don't suffer from the halting problem. Just because you're given a turing machine doesn't mean you can't use a subset of it with different properties.
- quickthrower2 3y agoOtherwise you’d give up having types and linters because god forbid they might prove a program will halt!