2 ms·

" In the Middle East, Eastern Europe and maybe Africa there is actually a good chance that the US spying will be used to overthrow your government " I like to k

" In the Middle East, Eastern Europe and maybe Africa there is actually a good chance that the US spying will be used to overthrow your government " I like to know more about those Eastern Europe US - controlled coups I didn't know about.

Intermernet 3y ago
Post cold war, the US have been very interested in having friendly governments in the previous eastern bloc nations. This hasn't been evident in actual coups, it's evident when you follow so called soft politics. Look at trade agreements, vocal support, NATO status etc for clues here. The US knows how to manipulate with both the carrot and the stick.
- snowpid 3y ago
  Do you can imagine any other reason despite "carrot and stick" why these governments were friendly to the US? And yes, soft power and coups are two very different things.
roenxi 3y ago
We've had reporting about how involved the CIA was in Ukraine from 2014 onwards (eg, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/10/23/ukraine-cia-shadow-war-russia/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/10/23/ukraine-cia-...). I was thinking about that when I wrote it. It looks a lot like they've set up a puppet government in Ukraine, it seems a bit incredible that level of trust just developed out of the blue after Euromaidan. And the CIA would have been almost negligent not to be involved in managing the Euromaidan. It'd line up well with the leaked recordings of Victoria Nuland discussing who should be in government, the relatively suicidal stance Ukraine then took towards diplomacy with Russia and just be in character for the CIA. I'd imagine the Belarusian government would look at that and much rather be using Huawei tech then Cisco. The risks are pretty obvious and one sided. And I doubt Ukraine is the only place the CIA have been moving in to in the east; any government in the region should be worried about US involvement in their politics.
- Paradigma11 3y ago
  The only reason the Euromaidan happened was, because Janukovych ran on a pro EU platform and promised an association agreement with the EU. The day before signing that agreement he got bought off by Putin and proclaimed that Ukraine would instead join a customs union with Russia and Belarus. No population would allow such a shameless betrayal without massive protests. This was completely on Russia and Janukovych without any possible influence of the CIA. The Nuland phone call was after Janukovych fled the country even though an agreement had been reached. And yes, Nuland had an opinion on what a solution could/should look like.
- khokhol 3y ago
  It looks a lot like they've set up a puppet government in Ukraine It "looks like", but only if we glance casually at a couple of articles (or sometimes even just headlines of articles) here and there, without taking the time to, like, actually read them. Or we pick up random partial factoids (like about the Nuland cable), and we start thinking "Hmm, this would align with [some vastly larger mental model we have the world works]" without stopping to think about what the factoid is actually about, or whether it actually has much of any significance to begin with. What you have here is article that says "CIA, Ukraine" and you're thinking right way it's about Ukraine being a puppet state. But that's not something the article asserts, or even comes close to talking about as a topic.
- snowpid 3y ago
  well look a conspiracy theorist. How many Ukrainians have you meet in whole life?

Intermernet 3y ago

Post cold war, the US have been very interested in having friendly governments in the previous eastern bloc nations. This hasn't been evident in actual coups, it's evident when you follow so called soft politics. Look at trade agreements, vocal support, NATO status etc for clues here. The US knows how to manipulate with both the carrot and the stick.

snowpid 3y ago
Do you can imagine any other reason despite "carrot and stick" why these governments were friendly to the US? And yes, soft power and coups are two very different things.

roenxi 3y ago

We've had reporting about how involved the CIA was in Ukraine from 2014 onwards (eg, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/10/23/ukraine-cia-shadow-war-russia/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/10/23/ukraine-cia-...). I was thinking about that when I wrote it. It looks a lot like they've set up a puppet government in Ukraine, it seems a bit incredible that level of trust just developed out of the blue after Euromaidan. And the CIA would have been almost negligent not to be involved in managing the Euromaidan. It'd line up well with the leaked recordings of Victoria Nuland discussing who should be in government, the relatively suicidal stance Ukraine then took towards diplomacy with Russia and just be in character for the CIA. I'd imagine the Belarusian government would look at that and much rather be using Huawei tech then Cisco. The risks are pretty obvious and one sided. And I doubt Ukraine is the only place the CIA have been moving in to in the east; any government in the region should be worried about US involvement in their politics.

Paradigma11 3y ago
The only reason the Euromaidan happened was, because Janukovych ran on a pro EU platform and promised an association agreement with the EU. The day before signing that agreement he got bought off by Putin and proclaimed that Ukraine would instead join a customs union with Russia and Belarus. No population would allow such a shameless betrayal without massive protests. This was completely on Russia and Janukovych without any possible influence of the CIA. The Nuland phone call was after Janukovych fled the country even though an agreement had been reached. And yes, Nuland had an opinion on what a solution could/should look like.
khokhol 3y ago
It looks a lot like they've set up a puppet government in Ukraine It "looks like", but only if we glance casually at a couple of articles (or sometimes even just headlines of articles) here and there, without taking the time to, like, actually read them. Or we pick up random partial factoids (like about the Nuland cable), and we start thinking "Hmm, this would align with [some vastly larger mental model we have the world works]" without stopping to think about what the factoid is actually about, or whether it actually has much of any significance to begin with. What you have here is article that says "CIA, Ukraine" and you're thinking right way it's about Ukraine being a puppet state. But that's not something the article asserts, or even comes close to talking about as a topic.
snowpid 3y ago
well look a conspiracy theorist. How many Ukrainians have you meet in whole life?