3 ms·
I don't know what you mean by consistency. What you call "personality" seems to roughly mean "predicting what humans like". That's what stuff like RLHF is for.
by staunton 3y ago
I don't know what you mean by consistency.
What you call "personality" seems to roughly mean "predicting what humans like". That's what stuff like RLHF is for. It's also not some sort of ascension where the computer program suddenly "becomes human". It's a spectrum on which we can expect steady improvements (and still never need to call computer programs "human").
- sedatk 3y agoI meant a certain aspect of aesthetics by "consistency". When you explain your requirements to AI, you'll say "create a dialog box with two buttons" right? I mean that's how you'd communicate with a programmer, so, I should at least be capable of that. However, AI cannot guarantee you a consistent style for such a prompt because it has no understanding of the culture, something the programmer, the prompter, and the users share altogether, but not the AI. AI might have access to the vast amount of design training data, but it can't understand the reasoning behind the variety of those designs, and it can't come up with a similar design every time. It has no cultural affinity, therefore no ability to stick to cultural norms. So, in order to fill that gap, you need to become more specific with your prompt. And the more specific you get, the more your language becomes closer to a programming language, therefore contradicting the purpose of the AI in the first place. I'm sure we'll see improvements, but I find it very unlikely to have the same level of understanding without having the same level of cognition and experience as a human, hence my phrasing.