3 ms·
>>Back then one stay-at-home-parent was a lot more normal. "a lot more" is doing a bunch of heavy lifting there... I was about 30 back then, and 2 working pare
by mech422 3y ago
>>Back then one stay-at-home-parent was a lot more normal.
"a lot more" is doing a bunch of heavy lifting there...
I was about 30 back then, and 2 working parents was considered 'normal'. One working parent was considered 'the dream'...
edit: the fact "latch key kids" was basically coined for gen-x kids would seem indicate 2 working parents was common.
- lmm 3y ago> edit: the fact "latch key kids" was basically coined for gen-x kids would seem indicate 2 working parents was common. The fact that it was a specific term indicates it was a known thing, but at the same time not pervasive in the way it is now.
- mech422 3y agosorry - I should have clarified that gen-x kids were a 70s/80s thing, so by the 90s it was even more common. Its late and I'm going to bed, but a quick search did turn up a bit more concrete data [0], it appears by 1988, 40+% of families were 'dual worker families'. It appears to be about 65% currently[1]. I'm guessing that would put it around 50% of families in the mid/late 1990s, so about a 15% change in ~30 years. I'd say 50+ percent counts as 'pervasive' in both cases. edit: I guess the point I was trying to make is that both parents having to work is a pretty old trend, with the majority of families needing dual incomes going back decades - and really doesn't seem to be getting any better. 0: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1990/03/art2full.pdf https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1990/03/art2full.pdf chart 1 page 16 1: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/famee.pdf https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/famee.pdf page 2, "families with children"