What does "scientific support" mean? Something can be scientifically supported and still harmful. It's scientifically supported that when the Judge Rotenberg

What does "scientific support" mean? Something can be scientifically supported and still harmful. It's scientifically supported that when the Judge Rotenberg Center electroshocks it patients it does make them more complaint. I would be a science denier if I said otherwise. That doesn't make it good. The problem people have with ABA is the lack of any real ethical oversight, not the notion that it's scientifically proven to be effective. I notice whenever I go onto communities of ABA practitioners they're constantly complaining about the companies they work for abusing them, but they're also simultaneously adamant that the "kiddos" are treated with the utmost ethical standards.