For context, a similar case, Di-az v Tesla [1] also about circumstances in the Tesla Fremont factory in 2017 found Tesla guilty [2] of "(1) Tesla subjected Diaz

For context, a similar case, Di-az v Tesla [1] also about circumstances in the Tesla Fremont factory in 2017 found Tesla guilty [2] of "(1) Tesla subjected Diaz to a racially hostile work environment, (2) Tesla was a joint employer of Diaz, (3) Diaz was subject to a hostile work environment caused by a supervisor, (4) Diaz was subject to a hostile work environment caused by a non-immediate supervisor or co-worker, (5) Tesla committed a civil rights violation in a contractual relationship, (6) Tesla failed to take all reasonable steps necessary to prevent Diaz from being subject to racial harassment, and (7) Tesla negligently supervised or negligently continued to employ Ramon Martinez and that action harmed Diaz. Id. at 1–2." This directly contradicts Telsa's crafted PR response linked to in the article [3] attempting to silence criticism by baselessly and intentionally accusing the employee of making false claims of pervasive racism. [1] https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-06748/context https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-06... [2] https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-06748/pdf/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-06748-9.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-06... [3] https://www.tesla.com/blog/hotbed-misinformation https://www.tesla.com/blog/hotbed-misinformation