> "is your claim that the firstborn child stops being the firstborn child when another child is born?" is not a reasonable reading of my words in any way, shape

> "is your claim that the firstborn child stops being the firstborn child when another child is born?" is not a reasonable reading of my words in any way, shape, or form. It's an absolutely absurd reading. which is why I asked for clarification. Just because what you said is ridiculous doesn't mean I should know what you meant. your communication sucks, get better at it. or don't, but the feedback has been given.