3 ms·
2000 was a leap year so it would not fail in 2100. But it would indeed fail in 2200/2300/2400 as 2100/2200/2300 are not leap years.
by gield 3y ago
2000 was a leap year so it would not fail in 2100. But it would indeed fail in 2200/2300/2400 as 2100/2200/2300 are not leap years.
- addandsubtract 3y agoBut then it's someone else's problem.
- topaz0 3y agoMost likely nobody's problem, really.