> There is not one bit of data in both the piece and the book. Without actual science you cannot improve the methods, or even know if the thesis is actually cor

> There is not one bit of data in both the piece and the book. Without actual science you cannot improve the methods, or even know if the thesis is actually correct. This looks like data (quoted in a different review): https://www.city-journal.org/article/review-of-bad-therapy-why-the-kids-arent-growing-up https://www.city-journal.org/article/review-of-bad-therapy-w...: > Researchers are beginning to notice that this same dynamic applies to other techniques for improving mental well-being. “More Treatment but No Less Depression: The Treatment Prevalence Paradox,” the title of a study of mental health and treatment in Western countries, captures the contradiction of the current situation. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34959153/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34959153/