4 ms·
> Or simply go to a company that does embrace remote. One does not simply go to another company right now. Hiring is slow, it's not 2021, and there's already t
by frfl 3y ago
> Or simply go to a company that does embrace remote.
One does not simply go to another company right now. Hiring is slow, it's not 2021, and there's already thousands of others also looking for work. It's easy to say, harder to do. Especially if you have a family, in addition to a full time job at a game company (not exactly a low stress environment itself)
> Amazon tried this and I believe reversed the decision because so many devs quit.
Every single job I see on Amazon's page for Software is in-person non-remote. Maybe they made exceptions for some, but anyone joining right now won't be remote. Same thing for any other FANG/MAANA/etc, Correct me if I'm mistaken.
- theultdev 3y agoWell then I guess they'll have to go to the office while they look for a new employer, the horror. But yeah I suppose some could group together to force the policy decisions of where everyone works... Those damn employers supporting people's families.
- text0404 3y agothose poor employers just trying to support everyone's families and those ungrateful developers working 7 days a week taking advantage of them, "building" the "products" that make the company "profitable" :( and now these maladjusted workers are thinking of organizing together??? for better working conditions??????? ridiculous. just go work at mcdonalds or something amirite
- theultdev 3y agoUhm where did you see they were making them work 7 days a week? This article is about them complaining about having to go into the office for 5 days. Working remotely is not a right. You have many people here who advocated against it vehemently for years. I prefer remote work and I'd only work for a full remote company, but in no way do I feel like it's my right to force a company to allow me be remote.
- text0404 3y agothe article is about the game industry. it's kind of well known for its toxicity and poor working conditions. - https://uniglobalunion.org/news/video-game-workers-crushed/ https://uniglobalunion.org/news/video-game-workers-crushed/ - https://old.reddit.com/r/gamedev/comments/588cai/why_do_we_accept_such_crappy_working_conditions/ https://old.reddit.com/r/gamedev/comments/588cai/why_do_we_a... - https://www.ns-businesshub.com/business/working-conditions-in-the-video-game-industry/ https://www.ns-businesshub.com/business/working-conditions-i... - https://slate.com/technology/2023/07/video-game-industry-labor-cooperatives.html https://slate.com/technology/2023/07/video-game-industry-lab... > Working remotely is not a right. it is if your work drives the company's profits and you can organize with your fellow workers and demand it! > I prefer remote work and I'd only work for a full remote company, but in no way do I feel like it's my right to force a company to allow me be remote. good for you, some of us see the employer beholden to the people who actually drive the company. try not to police your fellow workers while we advocate for better lives.
- theultdev 3y ago> the article is about the game industry. it's kind of well known for its toxicity and poor working conditions. Ah yes it's about the gaming industry, not a specific topic like company shifting to office work during the last period of development and workers not wanting to go in to the office. Makes it easy to shift that goal post when it's just about the industry, but you're also arguing that remote work is a right, so I'm not sure you even fell for that. Is Rockstar demanding 7 days? No. What you said is false and irrelevant. Don't try to conflate things that are irrelevant to this particular discussion. Either you view remote work as a right or not. I don't.
- text0404 3y agothe article is about employees angry that they're being forced back into the office when they already deal with poor working conditions. rockstar doesn't demand it, it's already a part of the culture of the industry. hence, why they're so upset. the first pull quote is literally "After so many broken promises we now fear management may even be paving the way for a return to toxic ‘crunch’ practices." please read the article before shitting all over people who are trying to better their working conditions. > Don't try to conflate things that are irrelevant to this particular discussion. it's not my fault you have poor reading comprehension and disdain for your fellow workers.