Sorry late to reply after work today, but you really got me thinking AR > everyone gets the same inflexible system. It's not logistically feasible to create

Sorry late to reply after work today, but you really got me thinking AR > everyone gets the same inflexible system. It's not logistically feasible to create a custom experience for each user based on how far they consent to every little thing, Is it though? Maybe this is where AI is going to be a win - in dynmaic protocols and bespoke interactions. What if we leave my "AI web-browsing agent" to talk to your "AI web server" to quite literally negotiate a whole bunch of preferences. Usual game theory applies. If your bot tries to defect or fuck mine over, or my bot is too greedy or defective we both get a suboptimal outcome? Maybe I am happy to trade certain bits of data like location or budget but will withold or lie about others, say age and gender. In response I might not get all the info I seek. By making the value of our transactional relations explicit some interesting things might happen. Maybe if your Wbserver agent is is a bit too greedy mine will shop around to other sites etc. respects.