3 ms·

I can understand getting the years 2000 (leap), 2100 (not leap), 2200 (not leap), and 2300 (not leap) wrong. But getting the year 2024 wrong is, disappointing,

• JohnFen 3y ago
  That's putting it very diplomatically indeed.
• samatman 3y ago
  Those are harder to get wrong, since leap year bugs are almost always from consumers of dates. To screw up a not-a-leap-year-year you'd need to produce a bogus February 29 on a real March 1. Date producers tend to understand how the calendar works better than that.