3 ms·
Your argument is akin to being against needles because the government might use them to perform lethal injections. I don't know if you've ever known any addict
by MisterBastahrd 3y ago
Your argument is akin to being against needles because the government might use them to perform lethal injections.
I don't know if you've ever known any addicts, but they aren't exactly happy about being addicted. Give them a treatment that works and is affordable and most of them will be just happy to get some targeted head buzzing to treat their symptoms.
- BizarroLand 3y agoThere is a similarity but I don't think it's quite 1:1. Both of your reference points are an order of magnitude weaker or stronger than mine. As I've said in other responses, my viewpoint is coming from the viewpoint of a generally healthy mind and not wanting that to be taken from me. If I become someone with an unhealthy mind my viewpoint could change.
- MisterBastahrd 3y agoHysterical scaremongering which masquerades as lucid, rational thought doesn't go very far here.
- BizarroLand 3y agoOnce again, an order of magnitude more than the reality. My response was not by any but the thinnest stretched imagination "hysterical scaremongering"
- confoundcofound 3y agoYour real problem is with the state, not with technology.
- BizarroLand 3y agoWrong again. It's trusting my brain to other people.