4 ms·
your thought process is all over the place. Gen-x was more independent because they were allowed to be, the family size doesn't have a lot of bearing on that,
by PH95VuimJjqBqy 3y ago
your thought process is all over the place.
Gen-x was more independent because they were allowed to be, the family size doesn't have a lot of bearing on that, but more than that it's a non-sequitur that somehow gen-x is a counter-example to the idea that smaller families lead to higher value placed on child safety. child safety and independence are orthogonal ideas.
- lapcat 3y ago> Gen-x was more independent because they were allowed to be Correct. > the family size doesn't have a lot of bearing on that Correct. > child safety and independence are orthogonal ideas. Incorrect.
- PH95VuimJjqBqy 3y agoyour last statement is only true if you believe in a binary world. In truth, a child can grab a can of soda out of the fridge without it being a safety concern.
- lapcat 3y ago> your last statement is only true if you believe in a binary world. That's basically a nonsensical reply. > In truth, a child can grab a can of soda out of the fridge without it being a safety concern. Nobody is talking about children grabbing cans of soda. That's a non sequitur. The submitted article: "Children need risk, fear, and excitement in play".
- PH95VuimJjqBqy 3y agoI'm not going to play that game, the discussion had meandered over to safety and independence as orthogonal things. we're done here.