4 ms·
It has the same problem as Quantum Leap in that the time passing in one timeline takes exactly the same amount of time as time passing another timeline. It feel
by alisonatwork 3y ago
It has the same problem as Quantum Leap in that the time passing in one timeline takes exactly the same amount of time as time passing another timeline. It feels like a contrived scenario that only exists to create dramatic tension.
Since the show got canceled, I don't know if it's ever explained, but the implication was that one "timeline" was essentially just a computer simulation in the other one... but if that's the case why not pause it? Why not adjust the parameters? Why can the simulation only be run in real-time?
I don't really need an answer. I don't mind suspending my disbelief for a decent story, and this was a decent story. It just stood out for me because the time travel stuff stood in contrast to the more plausible "20 minutes into the future" setting that perhaps could've made a compelling story on its own.
- WorldMaker 3y ago> Since the show got canceled, I don't know if it's ever explained, but the implication was that one "timeline" was essentially just a computer simulation in the other one... but if that's the case why not pause it? Why not adjust the parameters? Why can the simulation only be run in real-time? The book's sequels do explore some of "physics" (and "ethics") of that. Worth a read if you enjoyed the show.
- lproven 3y ago> but the implication was that one "timeline" was essentially just a computer simulation in the other one That was not the case, no. No simulations are involved.