3 ms·
Could the reason that 3 states in this case be more efficient than 2 states be that 3 is closer to 2.718... (Euler's number) than 2 is?
by WiSaGaN 3y ago
Could the reason that 3 states in this case be more efficient than 2 states be that 3 is closer to 2.718... (Euler's number) than 2 is?
- altruios 3y agoWhy not have some layers/nodes/systems be 2 states and have others be 3... couldn't you get arbitrarily close to Euler's number that way?