4 ms·
I doubt they actually think a Haskell client is going to be one that "matters". It's a fun bit of software, take it for what it is. Also, if you google "factu
by prospero 14y ago
I doubt they actually think a Haskell client is going to be one that "matters". It's a fun bit of software, take it for what it is.
Also, if you google "factual api", you get http://developer.factual.com/display/docs/Factual+Developer+APIs+Version+3 http://developer.factual.com/display/docs/Factual+Developer+... as the top result. Unless you're faulting them for not releasing wrappers in all languages simultaneously, I don't really understand your point.
- jonmarkgo 14y agoSorry, I didn't mean to say that they didn't have libraries available in other languages (they clearly state that they do in the blog post) - I was mostly just commenting on the tone of the post and how it might ostracize certain developer communities.
- prospero 14y agoIf they already have support for Ruby, PHP, Java, Objective-C, and server-side Javascript, then a post that claims Haskell and Clojure are the languages that "really matter" can probably be safely assumed to be a joke.