3 ms·
I don't get it. These examples are kinda uninspiring, generated SQL output being unnecessarily complicated doesn't help. I haven't used PRQL, but at least it's
by krick 3y ago
I don't get it. These examples are kinda uninspiring, generated SQL output being unnecessarily complicated doesn't help. I haven't used PRQL, but at least it's pretty obvious from examples, how it's nicer to use than SQL. But this one — yeah, examples on the left are "nicer" than convoluted output on the right, but if you write SQL normally, it's basically just a lot of "|" and table name in the beginning, instead of in the middle. So what's the point?