4 ms·
I don't get the hype around IPV6 from this angle. I'm going to slap tailscale on it anyway. I also think the topic is 100% orthogonal to OS choice
by k8svet 3y ago
I don't get the hype around IPV6 from this angle. I'm going to slap tailscale on it anyway. I also think the topic is 100% orthogonal to OS choice
- kkfx 3y agoNot much: to be "local first", classic desktop model, we also need connectivity, meaning the ability to reach ANY personal service without any third party IT services (just TLCs). My point is that we need at all level a declarative approach, but we need much more the classic desktop model who can exists only with a declarative approach easy enough that generic power users can manage a full home infra with all their systems/services self-hosted. This allow for FLOSS software targeting personal desktops like let's say Tox instead of Zoom, RetroShare instead of DropBox and so on. Services accessible with simplicity for anyone, all manageable with little code. All distributed solutions have too much overhead, so we need a classic client-server model, but for anyone hence and IPv6 with a global per host, a "family" domain name with relevant subdomains per hosts.