4 ms·
Not true anymore, but it also highly depends on what your definition of "a good one" is. Many people find Mistral 7B to be excellent, around gpt-3.5 level of g
by SushiHippie 3y ago
Not true anymore, but it also highly depends on what your definition of "a good one" is.
Many people find Mistral 7B to be excellent, around gpt-3.5 level of good.
Mistral 7B normally requires like 20gb VRAM, but with llama.cpp and quantization, you could even run it on your phone (albeit bad quality).
Quantization >= q4_K_M seem to provide nearly as good responses as the unquantized model, and q4_K_M only needs ~7GB of VRAM.
See the table here:
https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2-GGUF#provided-files https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2-GGU...
Using ollama you can get up and running even a bit faster than with llama.cpp directly (ollama uses llama.cpp under the hood).
- kouru225 3y agoOh Jesus so basically it’s very feasible for me to run my own local llm on a NAS or a server or something… well I guess it’s time for me to get on with the times… Thanks!
- anon373839 3y agoCan confirm. Mistral 7B is subjectively comparable to GPT 3.5-Turbo, and the Elo scores at lmsys.org support this.