3 ms·
I know nothing, but it felt like intel paid the price of being the first. They picked something hard and pricey.. and it didn't pan out in time, allowing other
by agumonkey 3y ago
I know nothing, but it felt like intel paid the price of being the first. They picked something hard and pricey.. and it didn't pan out in time, allowing other competitors to catch up and adapt to markets (mobile) nicely.
- throw0101c 3y ago> I know nothing, but it felt like intel paid the price of being the first. As the book goes into, there were other things in question: since TSMC only did fab, and did not design, they had more customers/opportunities to iterate the process and get good at it (more focus). There was internal-to-Intel stuff that led to lead loss as well. I'm only partially through the book currently, and there's a lot of chip history being described (going back to the 1950s), so I'm not going to retain all of it in a single pass.