> In his written statement, Siddons argues that by citing Wingenroth on Dec. 6, the agency was enforcing its laws inconsistently and “further confounding the si

> In his written statement, Siddons argues that by citing Wingenroth on Dec. 6, the agency was enforcing its laws inconsistently and “further confounding the situation.” He says that during the trial, neither game warden could recall ever citing a hunter for trying to recover downed game at night — nor could they point to a single section of the state’s game code that supported their position. This has got to be the dumbest case for entrapment that I've ever seen. The taxpayers should have recourse against agencies that do things like this, particularly given the PA Game Commission's history of dimwitted fuckery.