My comment on the other thread pointed out that these people have specific, political views that they want to force on everyone in every system and institution.

My comment on the other thread pointed out that these people have specific, political views that they want to force on everyone in every system and institution. They treat as evil anyone who is white, male, supports biological genders, straight, and so on. They then “fix” the “problem” by systematically discriminating against those groups by removing or replacing them. For OpenAI and Gemini, they are using both fine-tuning and system prompts to do this with Google’s being in the prompt. That leads to the next problem: many media outlets are on board with the same stuff and lie about it, too. This outlet didn’t report that Google had people trying to force everyone to think a certain way, changed an easily-modified prompt to do it, etc. Instead, the author puts time into accusing everyone in the world of bias like racism, pretends Google was merely trying to counter some of it, and talks like what they did was really hard to avoid. They’re lying to back those in their camp. Compare it to this short video by a conservative reporter: https://youtu.be/RGOtLLEVKEM?si=lPmY9t2VcG-CYDQJ https://youtu.be/RGOtLLEVKEM?si=lPmY9t2VcG-CYDQJ While he’s biased and the ads are annoying, he quickly calls out the purpose of what they’re doing (eg CRT/DEI-style views), cites prior statements by a person in the program showing their politics are polar opposite of most users, showing the arrogance of the people behind these AI’s, and cites another expert who explains technically how the flaw happened (and was easily avoidable). So, colleges, tech companies, and liberal outlets keep supporting systematic discrimination built on Marxist-like theories of equity. They often lie about what they are doing. If they get caught, they lie to make each other look better. We should never trust such people or their policies with our future. Whereas, Jesus said we should be righteous and loving and just. That the truth will set us free. We’re honest about what we do, where it came from, what good it’s done over time when people actually followed God’s Word (and design), and that we’re better off going back to what worked. Then, fixing problems we see in honest, godly ways in humility. Not the deception or hubris these program directors seem to have.