3 ms·
A: So you have three 49-person companies ... That's odd. B: I employ no more than 49 people in each of my companies and start new companies as necessary to av
by briandon 14y ago
A: So you have three 49-person companies ... That's odd.
B: I employ no more than 49 people in each of my companies and start new companies as necessary to avoid sharing profits with my employees, having to deal with worker councils, and the like.
Playing corporate twister to evade the clear intent of laws sure seems like loophole exploitation to me.
In addition to working around the intent of laws that empower workers, organized groups of business owners are constantly trying to overturn those laws and, in the meantime, discourage enforcement.
- wlievens 14y agoI think the problem is with "intent of laws". Laws should minimize the degree to which intent plays a role, because intent is subjective, and therefore subject to very expensive and wasteful litigation.