5 ms·

Please sir can you then explain to me where in the law does it say that it’s okay to use a civilian harrass, steal from, attack another civilian simply because

by hcfman 3y ago

Please sir can you then explain to me where in the law does it say that it’s okay to use a civilian harrass, steal from, attack another civilian simply because he inconveniently lived next door to the target of an illegal intervention? The prosecutor that I’m talking about was the former head of the RIEC. The very organisation that embodies the entirely of this war against undermining that you are talking about. The civilian that I managed to force to court for stalking had been protected by this prosecutor for more than 10 years!!!!!!!! Which part exactly am I’m seeing out of perspective ? I’ve read a lot of criminal law! A civilian is not allowed to be used in an investigation that involves obsessive spying (stelselmatig observatie). For more than one year at a time, they need a contract in advance and they are not allowed to commit any crimes. So why are the openbare ministerie protecting this guy and publishing lies about me more than 10 years later???? I took the police to court and won. That also took me 5 years. I’ve seen the evidence that this guys was being protected by the OM. And that our lives were in danger from him. I have the reference numbers from the police files. You seem to have a vested interest in all this, are you going to tell the listeners who the responsible prosecutor was for the villa murder scandal ? How about telling them what position this person has now ? The person responsible for the injustice referred to in the series de Villamoord was also one of the prosecutors responsible for the living hell that was inflicted on me and my family when we were accidentally caught between their stupid games that destroy peoples lives. Are you also one of the people think that it’s okay to commit criminality against innocent civilians and strip them of their rights as well ?

brnt 3y ago
No, I'm saying that the government is failing to correctly address this crime. You seem to be arguing that the problem doesn't exist, because they mishandle things. They are orthogonal things.
- hcfman 3y ago
  No that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that they have used this problem as a power grab and the power grab has destroyed the foundation of a democracy. That's not worth it. It's not worth it because it's not necessary. You are turning the country into the same sort of place that Navalny lived in. It not necessary to allow prosecutors to pervert the course of justice and lie under oath whenever they want, because then a court is meaningly. It's not necessary because a functioning democracy should be able to weather being found wrong and should be accountable. They have become completely unaccountable. And it's unnecessary because what value is there to harrass someone and their neighbor's after they have already been convicted and punished?
- hcfman 3y ago
  By orthogonal do you mean you can deal with one of the things and ignore the other? Well.. you can't if you value democracy. Clearly they didn't.
hcfman 3y ago
10 years long harrassing, stealing from, tampering with the cars from the neighbor of someone convicted of growing weed can hardly be described as mis-handling things. That's very very severe.

by hcfman 3y ago

brnt 3y ago

No, I'm saying that the government is failing to correctly address this crime. You seem to be arguing that the problem doesn't exist, because they mishandle things. They are orthogonal things.

hcfman 3y ago
No that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that they have used this problem as a power grab and the power grab has destroyed the foundation of a democracy. That's not worth it. It's not worth it because it's not necessary. You are turning the country into the same sort of place that Navalny lived in. It not necessary to allow prosecutors to pervert the course of justice and lie under oath whenever they want, because then a court is meaningly. It's not necessary because a functioning democracy should be able to weather being found wrong and should be accountable. They have become completely unaccountable. And it's unnecessary because what value is there to harrass someone and their neighbor's after they have already been convicted and punished?
hcfman 3y ago
By orthogonal do you mean you can deal with one of the things and ignore the other? Well.. you can't if you value democracy. Clearly they didn't.

hcfman 3y ago

10 years long harrassing, stealing from, tampering with the cars from the neighbor of someone convicted of growing weed can hardly be described as mis-handling things. That's very very severe.